In the legal profession, precision and persuasion are paramount. While legal terms and precedents form the bedrock of arguments, the strategic use of adjectives can significantly enhance a lawyer’s ability to influence judges, juries, and opposing counsel.
Understanding how to effectively employ adjectives is crucial for crafting compelling narratives, highlighting key details, and ultimately, winning cases. This article delves into the world of adjectives, specifically tailored for lawyers, exploring their definition, types, usage rules, and common pitfalls.
Whether you’re a seasoned attorney or a law student, mastering adjectives will undoubtedly elevate your legal writing and advocacy skills.
This comprehensive guide is designed for legal professionals and students seeking to refine their command of the English language. By understanding the nuances of adjective usage, lawyers can construct more persuasive arguments, draft clearer legal documents, and communicate more effectively with clients and colleagues.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Definition of Adjectives
- Structural Breakdown of Adjectives
- Types of Adjectives
- Examples of Adjectives in Legal Writing
- Usage Rules for Adjectives
- Common Mistakes with Adjectives
- Practice Exercises
- Advanced Topics
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Conclusion
Definition of Adjectives
An adjective is a word that modifies or describes a noun or pronoun. Adjectives provide additional information about the qualities, characteristics, or state of being of the noun or pronoun they modify.
They answer questions like “What kind?”, “Which one?”, “How many?”, or “How much?” Understanding the role of adjectives is vital for lawyers, as precise and evocative descriptions can significantly impact the persuasiveness of legal arguments and the clarity of legal documents.
Classification of Adjectives
Adjectives can be classified based on their function and the type of information they convey. Some common classifications include descriptive adjectives (describing qualities), quantitative adjectives (indicating quantity), demonstrative adjectives (pointing out specific nouns), possessive adjectives (showing ownership), and interrogative adjectives (used in questions).
Each type plays a unique role in shaping the meaning of a sentence and can be strategically employed to enhance the impact of legal writing.
Function of Adjectives in Legal Contexts
In legal contexts, adjectives serve several crucial functions. They help to clarify ambiguity, provide specific details, and create a vivid picture for the reader or listener. For instance, instead of simply stating “the contract,” a lawyer might use “the unambiguous contract” or “the fraudulent contract” to convey a specific interpretation. Adjectives can also be used to emphasize certain aspects of a case, highlight the credibility (or lack thereof) of witnesses, and influence the emotional response of the audience. The careful selection of adjectives can significantly sway the perception of facts and arguments.
Contexts of Adjective Use
Adjectives find application across various legal contexts, including contract drafting, legal briefs, courtroom arguments, and client communication. In contract drafting, adjectives are used to define the scope and limitations of agreements, ensuring clarity and avoiding potential disputes.
Legal briefs utilize adjectives to present a compelling narrative of the case, highlighting favorable evidence and downplaying unfavorable aspects. Courtroom arguments rely on adjectives to persuade the judge or jury, emphasizing the strengths of the lawyer’s position and the weaknesses of the opponent’s.
Effective client communication involves using clear and concise adjectives to explain complex legal concepts in an accessible manner.
Structural Breakdown of Adjectives
Understanding the structural placement of adjectives within a sentence is crucial for effective communication. Adjectives can appear in different positions, each influencing the emphasis and meaning of the sentence.
The most common positions are attributive (before the noun), predicative (after a linking verb), and absolute (modifying the noun without being directly attached to it).
Attributive Adjectives
Attributive adjectives appear directly before the noun they modify. This is the most common placement for adjectives. Attributive adjectives directly describe the noun, providing essential information about its qualities or characteristics. For example, in the phrase “the corrupt official,” the adjective “corrupt” immediately precedes and modifies the noun “official.” This structure is straightforward and commonly used in legal writing to provide clear and concise descriptions.
Predicative Adjectives
Predicative adjectives follow a linking verb (such as is, are, was, were, seems, appears). They describe the subject of the sentence rather than directly modifying a noun. For example, in the sentence “The evidence is compelling,” the adjective “compelling” follows the linking verb “is” and describes the noun “evidence.” Predicative adjectives often provide a more nuanced description, focusing on the state or condition of the subject.
Absolute Adjectives
Absolute adjectives modify the noun, but are separated by commas. They provide extra information about the noun. For example, “The witness, nervous and hesitant, took the stand.” Here, nervous and hesitant are absolute adjectives describing the witness.
Types of Adjectives
Adjectives come in various forms, each serving a distinct purpose in describing nouns or pronouns. Recognizing these different types allows lawyers to choose the most appropriate words to convey their intended meaning with precision.
Descriptive Adjectives
Descriptive adjectives, also known as qualitative adjectives, describe the qualities or characteristics of a noun. They answer the question “What kind?” and provide details about color, size, shape, texture, or other attributes. In legal writing, descriptive adjectives help create a vivid picture for the reader, allowing them to better understand the facts of the case. Examples include: fraudulent, negligent, valid, complex, relevant.
Quantitative Adjectives
Quantitative adjectives indicate the quantity or amount of a noun. They answer the question “How many?” or “How much?” and are essential for specifying numerical values or amounts in legal documents. Examples include: several, few, many, all, some, sufficient, substantial.
Demonstrative Adjectives
Demonstrative adjectives point out specific nouns. They include words like this, that, these, and those. Demonstrative adjectives help to identify particular items or individuals within a group, making the reference clear and unambiguous. They are useful for distinguishing between different pieces of evidence or identifying specific parties in a legal dispute. For example: “This document is crucial,” “That witness provided false testimony.”
Possessive Adjectives
Possessive adjectives indicate ownership or possession. They include words like my, your, his, her, its, our, and their. Possessive adjectives are essential for establishing who owns what, which is often a critical aspect of legal cases involving property, contracts, or intellectual property rights. For example: “His client signed the contract,” “Their company is liable.”
Interrogative Adjectives
Interrogative adjectives are used in questions to ask about a noun. The main interrogative adjectives are which and whose. They help to seek specific information about the noun being questioned. For example: “Which law applies to this case?” “Whose responsibility was it to maintain the property?”
Distributive Adjectives
Distributive adjectives refer to members of a group individually. They include words like each, every, either, and neither. Distributive adjectives emphasize that something applies to each member of a group separately, rather than to the group as a whole. For example: “Each party is responsible for their own legal fees,” “Every employee must sign the confidentiality agreement.”
Proper Adjectives
Proper adjectives are formed from proper nouns and describe something associated with that noun. They are always capitalized. For example: American laws, Shakespearean sonnets, Victorian era. In legal contexts, proper adjectives might refer to specific jurisdictions or legal systems, such as Constitutional law or Federal regulations.
Compound Adjectives
Compound adjectives are formed by combining two or more words, often hyphenated, to modify a noun. They create a single, more specific description. For example: well-documented evidence, long-standing precedent, high-profile case. Compound adjectives can add precision and nuance to legal writing, allowing lawyers to convey complex ideas in a concise manner.
Examples of Adjectives in Legal Writing
The strategic use of adjectives can significantly enhance the clarity, persuasiveness, and impact of legal writing. Here are several examples categorized by adjective type to illustrate their application in various legal contexts.
Descriptive Adjective Examples
Descriptive adjectives are crucial for providing detailed and vivid descriptions in legal documents and arguments. The following table illustrates how descriptive adjectives can be used to paint a clearer picture and influence the reader’s perception.
| Sentence | Descriptive Adjective | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| The witness gave a detailed account of the events. | Detailed | Emphasizes the thoroughness and credibility of the witness’s testimony. |
| The company engaged in fraudulent business practices. | Fraudulent | Highlights the deceptive nature of the company’s actions. |
| The contract contained ambiguous language. | Ambiguous | Indicates a lack of clarity in the contract terms. |
| The defendant displayed negligent behavior. | Negligent | Accuses the defendant of failing to exercise reasonable care. |
| The judge issued a binding ruling. | Binding | Indicates that the ruling is legally enforceable. |
| The evidence presented was compelling. | Compelling | Suggests that the evidence is persuasive and convincing. |
| The lawyer provided sound legal advice. | Sound | Indicates that the advice is reliable and well-reasoned. |
| The court made an erroneous decision. | Erroneous | Suggests that the decision was based on incorrect information or reasoning. |
| The agreement was deemed unenforceable. | Unenforceable | Indicates that the agreement cannot be legally enforced. |
| The plaintiff suffered significant damages. | Significant | Emphasizes the extent and severity of the damages. |
| The defendant offered a plausible explanation. | Plausible | Suggests that the explanation is believable, though not necessarily true. |
| The document contained confidential information. | Confidential | Highlights the sensitivity and protected nature of the information. |
| The witness provided credible testimony. | Credible | Suggests that the testimony is believable and trustworthy. |
| The case involved a complex legal issue. | Complex | Indicates that the legal issue is intricate and requires careful analysis. |
| The investigation revealed damning evidence. | Damning | Emphasizes the severity and incriminating nature of the evidence. |
| The lawyer made a persuasive argument. | Persuasive | Suggests that the argument is compelling and likely to convince the listener. |
| The judge delivered an impartial verdict. | Impartial | Indicates that the verdict was fair and unbiased. |
| The contract included onerous terms. | Onerous | Suggests that the terms are burdensome and unfair. |
| The company faced crippling debt. | Crippling | Emphasizes the severity and debilitating impact of the debt. |
| The lawyer presented a novel legal theory. | Novel | Indicates that the legal theory is new and innovative. |
| The court upheld the constitutional rights of the defendant. | Constitutional | Affirms the fundamental rights protected by the Constitution. |
| The plaintiff claimed emotional distress. | Emotional | Highlights the psychological impact of the defendant’s actions. |
| The evidence was deemed admissible in court. | Admissible | Indicates that the evidence meets the legal standards for being presented. |
| The witness was found to be unreliable. | Unreliable | Suggests that the witness’s testimony is not trustworthy. |
These examples demonstrate how descriptive adjectives can be strategically used to shape the perception of facts and arguments in legal contexts. By choosing the right adjectives, lawyers can effectively communicate their intended message and influence the outcome of a case.
Quantitative Adjective Examples
Quantitative adjectives are essential for specifying amounts, quantities, or degrees in legal documents. The following table illustrates how quantitative adjectives can be used to provide precise information and support legal claims.
| Sentence | Quantitative Adjective | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| The contract involved several parties. | Several | Indicates that there were more than two parties involved. |
| The company suffered substantial financial losses. | Substantial | Emphasizes the significant amount of financial losses. |
| The witness provided few details about the incident. | Few | Indicates that the witness’s testimony was lacking in specific information. |
| The lawsuit involved many plaintiffs. | Many | Indicates a large number of plaintiffs. |
| All defendants were found guilty. | All | Indicates that every defendant was convicted. |
| The evidence was of sufficient quality to secure a conviction. | Sufficient | Indicates that the evidence met the necessary standard for a conviction. |
| The agreement included numerous clauses. | Numerous | Highlights the large amount of clauses contained in the agreement. |
| The company paid significant amount in damages. | Significant | Emphasizes the large amount of damages paid. |
| The contract provided limited liability. | Limited | Indicates restricted or reduced liability. |
| The company only had a few assets. | Few | Indicates the company possessed a small amount of assets. |
| Several witnesses corroborated the story. | Several | Indicates more than two witnesses confirmed the account. |
| The lawyer presented multiple arguments. | Multiple | Highlights that the lawyer raised more than one argument. |
| The case involved several high-profile individuals. | Several | Indicates that more than two well-known people were connected. |
| The agreement included numerous provisions. | Numerous | Highlights the high amount of provisions included. |
| The company had several outstanding debts. | Several | Indicates that the company had more than two unpaid debts. |
| The investigation uncovered numerous violations. | Numerous | Highlights that many violations were detected. |
| The witness provided limited information. | Limited | Indicates that the witness provided small amount of information. |
| The company faced substantial financial penalties. | Substantial | Emphasizes the significant amount of financial penalties. |
| The lawyer had several successful cases. | Several | Indicates that the lawyer had more than two successful cases. |
| The contract had limited number of revisions. | Limited | Indicates that there were a small amount of revisions made. |
| The plaintiff demanded substantial compensation. | Substantial | Emphasizes the large amount of money plaintiff asked for. |
| Only a few documents were relevant to the case. | Few | Indicates that a small amount of documents were relevant. |
| The lawsuit involved numerous claims. | Numerous | Highlights that there were a lot of claims made. |
| The defendant only had few resources. | Few | Indicates that the defendant had a small amount of resources. |
These examples demonstrate the importance of using precise quantitative adjectives in legal contexts to avoid ambiguity and ensure clarity in legal documents and arguments.
Demonstrative Adjective Examples
Demonstrative adjectives are used to point out specific nouns, clarifying which particular item or individual is being referred to. The following table illustrates how demonstrative adjectives can be used in legal contexts to distinguish between different elements of a case.
| Sentence | Demonstrative Adjective | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| This evidence is crucial to the case. | This | Highlights the importance of a specific piece of evidence being presented. |
| That document proves the defendant’s guilt. | That | Points out a specific document that supports the prosecution’s case. |
| These witnesses can corroborate the plaintiff’s testimony. | These | Identifies specific witnesses who will support the plaintiff’s account. |
| Those emails contain incriminating evidence. | Those | Refers to specific emails that are damaging to the defendant. |
| This law applies to the current situation. | This | Specifies which particular law is relevant to the case at hand. |
| That precedent supports our argument. | That | Refers to a specific legal precedent that backs up the argument being made. |
| These regulations are being challenged in court. | These | Identifies specific regulations that are the subject of the legal challenge. |
| Those policies were implemented without proper review. | Those | Refers to particular policies that were put in place without adequate scrutiny. |
| This provision of the contract is ambiguous. | This | Highlights a specific section of the contract that is unclear. |
| That clause is unenforceable. | That | Points out a specific clause that cannot be legally enforced. |
| These terms were agreed upon by both parties. | These | Identifies specific terms that were accepted by both parties involved. |
| Those conditions were not met by the defendant. | Those | Refers to particular conditions that the defendant failed to fulfill. |
| This case sets a new precedent. | This | Specifies a particular case that is establishing a new legal standard. |
| That ruling was overturned on appeal. | That | Refers to a specific decision that was reversed by a higher court. |
| These appeals are being considered by the court. | These | Identifies specific appeals that are currently under review by the court. |
| Those judgments have been challenged. | Those | Refers to particular court decisions that have been disputed. |
| This affidavit contains critical information. | This | Highlights the importance of a specific sworn statement. |
| That deposition revealed inconsistencies in the witness’s testimony. | That | Points out a particular recorded testimony that shows contradictions. |
| These interrogatories must be answered truthfully. | These | Identifies specific written questions that must be answered honestly. |
| Those documents were submitted as evidence. | Those | Refers to particular papers that were presented to the court. |
| This incident led to the investigation. | This | Specifies a particular event that triggered the inquiry. |
| That action constituted a breach of contract. | That | Points out a specific deed that violated the terms of the agreement. |
| These events transpired before the contract was signed. | These | Identifies specific things that occurred before the signing. |
| Those circumstances justify the court’s decision. | Those | Refers to particular factors that support the court’s ruling. |
By using demonstrative adjectives effectively, lawyers can ensure that their references are clear and that the reader or listener understands exactly which items or individuals are being discussed.
Possessive Adjective Examples
Possessive adjectives are used to indicate ownership or possession. In legal contexts, they are crucial for establishing who owns what, which is often central to disputes over property, contracts, or intellectual property.
The following table illustrates how possessive adjectives can be used to clarify ownership and responsibility.
| Sentence | Possessive Adjective | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| His client signed the contract. | His | Indicates that the client belongs to the lawyer being referenced. |
| Her testimony was crucial to the case. | Her | Indicates that the testimony belongs to the female witness. |
| Their company is liable for the damages. | Their | Indicates that the company belongs to the group of people being referenced. |
| My client denies all allegations. | My | Indicates that the client belongs to the speaker. |
| Your cooperation is required for the investigation. | Your | Indicates the cooperation of the person being spoken to. |
| The company protected its intellectual property. | Its | Indicates that the intellectual property belongs to the company. |
| Our legal team is prepared to defend the case. | Our | Indicates that the legal team belongs to the speaker. |
| The witness changed her story multiple times. | Her | Indicates the witness is female. |
| The judge issued his ruling. | His | Indicates the judge is male. |
| The company argued that the design was its own. | Its | Indicates the design belonged to the company. |
| The lawyer presented his closing arguments. | His | Indicates the lawyer is male. |
| The plaintiff stated that her rights were violated. | Her | Indicates the plaintiff is female. |
| The defendants claimed the land was their property. | Their | Indicates the land belonged to the group of people. |
| The officer had his suspicions. | His | Indicates the officer is male. |
| The witness explained her point of view. | Her | Indicates the witness is female. |
| The lawyers discussed their strategies. | Their | Indicates a group of lawyers. |
| The defendant presented his version of events. | His | Indicates the defendant is male. |
| The doctor shared her medical opinion. | Her | Indicates the doctor is female. |
| The expert gave his professional assessment. | His | Indicates the expert is male. |
| The accountant reviewed her financial analysis. | Her | Indicates the accountant is female. |
| The inspector performed his inspection. | His | Indicates the inspector is male. |
| The investigator filed her report. | Her | Indicates the investigator is female. |
| The auditor completed her audit. | Her | Indicates the auditor is female. |
| The analyst presented his findings. | His | Indicates the analyst is male. |
By clearly indicating ownership with possessive adjectives, lawyers can avoid ambiguity and ensure that the legal arguments are based on a solid foundation of property rights and responsibilities.
Other Adjective Examples
This section offers additional examples of adjectives in legal contexts, covering interrogative, distributive, proper, and compound adjectives to further illustrate their diverse applications.
| Sentence | Adjective Type | Adjective | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which law applies to this case? | Interrogative | Which | Asks about a specific law relevant to the case. |
| Whose responsibility was it to maintain the property? | Interrogative | Whose | Asks about the person responsible for property maintenance. |
| Each party is responsible for their own legal fees. | Distributive | Each | Emphasizes that each party has individual responsibility. |
| Every employee must sign the confidentiality agreement. | Distributive | Every | Highlights that all employees are required to sign. |
| An American court heard the case. | Proper | American | Indicates the court is located in America. |
| The contract was governed by California law. | Proper | California | Specifies that California law applies. |
| The evidence was well-documented. | Compound | Well-documented | Indicates that the evidence is thoroughly recorded. |
| The case involved a long-standing dispute. | Compound | Long-standing | Highlights that the dispute has existed for a long time. |
| The lawyer presented a thought-provoking argument. | Compound | Thought-provoking | Indicates that the argument is stimulating and insightful. |
| The judge made a well-reasoned decision. | Compound | Well-reasoned | Highlights that the decision is logically justified. |
| The witness gave a first-hand account of the event. | Compound | First-hand | Indicates that the witness experienced the event directly. |
| The lawyer provided up-to-date advice. | Compound | Up-to-date | Indicates that the advice is current and relevant. |
| Every defendant has equal rights. | Distributive | Equal | Emphasizes that rights are distributed equally. |
| Neither party wanted to settle. | Distributive | Neither | Indicates that neither party wished to settle. |
| The lawyer specializes in intellectual property. | Proper | Intellectual | Indicates a specific kind of property. |
| The case involved a high-profile celebrity. | Compound | High-profile | Highlights that a famous person was involved. |
| The company had a well-defined strategy. | Compound | Well-defined | Indicates that the strategy was clear and detailed. |
| The case involved a hard-working lawyer. | Compound | Hard-working | Highlights the diligence of the lawyer. |
| The court made a much-needed intervention. | Compound | Much-needed | Indicates that the intervention was necessary. |
| The lawyer was well-prepared for the trial. | Compound | Well-prepared | Highlights the readiness of the lawyer. |
| The witness provided second-hand information. | Compound | Second-hand | Indicates that the witness did not experience the event directly. |
| The expert gave objective testimony. | Descriptive | Objective | Emphasizes the impartiality of the testimony. |
| The company faced stringent regulations. | Descriptive | Stringent | Highlights the strictness of the regulations. |
These examples showcase the versatility of adjectives in legal writing, demonstrating how they can be used to ask questions, distribute responsibilities, specify jurisdictions, and create nuanced descriptions.
Usage Rules for Adjectives
To effectively use adjectives, it’s essential to understand the rules governing their placement, forms, and interaction with other words. This section covers important usage rules, including the order of adjectives, comparative and superlative forms, and the use of adjectives with articles.
Order of Adjectives
When using multiple adjectives to modify a noun, there is a general order that should be followed to ensure clarity and natural-sounding language. While not a strict rule, adhering to this order can improve the flow and readability of your writing.
The typical order of adjectives in English is:
- Quantity or Number: one, two, several, few
- Opinion: beautiful, ugly, interesting, important
- Size: large, small, tall, tiny
- Age: old, new, ancient, modern
- Shape: round, square, triangular
- Color: red, blue, green, yellow
- Origin: American, French, Chinese
- Material: wooden, metal, plastic
- Purpose: writing (desk), sleeping (bag)
For example:
- A few interesting old books.
- The large square blue box.
- An important American legal document.
In legal writing, this order can help to present information in a logical and coherent manner, making it easier for the reader to understand the intended meaning.
Comparative and Superlative Forms
Adjectives can be used to compare two or more nouns. The comparative form is used to compare two things, while the superlative form is used to compare three or more things.
The rules for forming comparative and superlative adjectives depend on the length and structure of the adjective.
- For most one-syllable adjectives, add -er for the comparative form and -est for the superlative form.
- Example: old, older, oldest
- Example: big, bigger, biggest
- For most two-syllable adjectives ending in -y, change the -y to -i and add -er for the comparative form and -est for the superlative form.
- Example: happy, happier, happiest
- Example: easy, easier, easiest
- For most adjectives with three or more syllables, use more for the comparative form and most for the superlative form.
- Example: important, more important, most important
- Example: complex, more complex, most complex
- Irregular adjectives have unique comparative and superlative forms that must be memorized.
- Example: good, better, best
- Example: bad, worse, worst
- Example: far, farther/further, farthest/furthest
In legal contexts, comparative and superlative adjectives are often used to emphasize the degree of something, such as the severity of damages or the strength of evidence. For example:
- “The more compelling evidence was presented by the prosecution.”
- “This is the most significant case in the history of the firm.”
Adjectives with Articles
Adjectives are often used with articles (a, an, the) to modify nouns. The choice of article depends on whether the noun is specific or general, and whether the adjective begins with a vowel or a consonant sound.
- Use a before adjectives that begin with a consonant sound.
- Example: a fraudulent contract
- Example: a complex legal issue
- Use an before adjectives that begin with a vowel sound.
- Example: an ambiguous term
- Example: an enforceable agreement
- Use the when referring to a specific noun or when the noun has already been mentioned.
- Example: “The lawyer reviewed the detailed report.”
- Example: “The court issued the binding ruling.”
Proper use of articles with adjectives helps to clarify the meaning of the sentence and avoid ambiguity.
Exceptions and Special Cases
While the above rules provide a general framework for adjective usage, there are exceptions and special cases to be aware of:
- Compound Adjectives: When using compound adjectives before a noun, they are often hyphenated (e.g., well-documented evidence). However, if the compound adjective follows the noun, it is generally not hyphenated (e.g., “The evidence was well documented“).
- Adjectives as Nouns: In some cases, adjectives can be used as nouns, referring to a general group of people or things (e.g., “The poor deserve assistance,” “The guilty must be punished”). In these cases, the adjective is usually preceded by the.
- Adjectives with Linking Verbs: When using adjectives with linking verbs (e.g., is, are, seems), the adjective describes the subject of the sentence rather than directly modifying a noun (e.g., “The evidence is compelling“).
- Coordinate Adjectives: Coordinate adjectives are two or more adjectives that independently modify the same noun and are separated by a comma (e.g., “The complex, lengthy trial”). If the adjectives do not independently modify the noun, do not use a comma (e.g., “The old wooden desk”).
Understanding these exceptions and special cases will help you to use adjectives with greater accuracy and confidence in your legal writing.
Common Mistakes with Adjectives
Even experienced writers can make mistakes with adjectives. Here are some common errors to avoid in legal writing:
- Misplaced Adjectives: Placing an adjective in the wrong position can change the meaning of the sentence. Ensure that the adjective is close to the noun it modifies to avoid confusion.
- Incorrect: “The defendant was questioned about the incident by the lead detective.”
- Correct: “The defendant was questioned by the lead detective about the incident.”
- Incorrect Comparative/Superlative Forms: Using the wrong comparative or superlative form can undermine the credibility of your writing.
- Incorrect: “This is the most good argument.”
- Correct: “This is the best argument.”
- Unnecessary Adjectives: Overusing adjectives can make your writing verbose and less impactful. Choose adjectives carefully and only use them when they add significant meaning.
- Overuse: “The lengthy, complex, and intricate legal document…”
- Better: “The complex legal document…”
- Subjective Adjectives Without Support: Avoid using subjective adjectives (e.g., unfair, unjust) without providing factual support. Back up your claims with evidence and reasoning.
- Weak: “The ruling was unfair.”
- Stronger: “The ruling was unfair because it disregarded key evidence and contradicted established precedent.”
- Incorrect Use of Articles: Using the wrong article (a, an, the) with adjectives can create confusion and grammatical errors.
- Incorrect: “A ambiguous contract.”
- Correct: “An ambiguous contract.”
- Redundant Adjectives: Avoid using adjectives that repeat information already contained in the noun.
- Redundant: “The yellow in color banana.”
- Correct: “The yellow banana.”
- Inconsistent Tone: Ensure that the tone conveyed by your adjectives aligns with the overall tone of your legal document. Avoid using overly emotional or informal adjectives in formal legal writing.
By being mindful of these common mistakes, lawyers can improve the clarity, accuracy, and persuasiveness of their writing.
Practice Exercises
To reinforce your understanding of adjectives, try these practice exercises designed to test your knowledge and improve your skills.
Exercise 1: Identifying Adjectives
Identify the adjectives in the following sentences and classify them by type (descriptive, quantitative, demonstrative, possessive, etc.).
- This evidence is crucial for the case.
- The fraudulent company caused substantial damages.
- Her client provided a detailed account.
- Which law applies to this situation?
- Every employee must sign the confidential agreement.
Answers:
- This (demonstrative)
- Fraudulent (descriptive), substantial (quantitative)
- Her (possessive), detailed (descriptive)
- Which (interrogative), this (demonstrative)
- Every (distributive), confidential (descriptive)
Exercise 2: Choosing the Correct Adjective
Choose the correct adjective from the options provided to complete the following sentences.
- The contract contained __________ language. (ambiguous / clear)
- The witness provided __________ testimony. (credible / unreliable)
- The company faced __________ financial losses. (significant / minor)
- The judge issued a __________ ruling. (binding / non-binding)
- The lawyer presented a __________ argument. (persuasive / unconvincing)
Answers:
- ambiguous
- credible
- significant
- binding
- persuasive
Exercise 3: Ordering Adjectives
Rearrange the adjectives in the correct order in the following sentences.
- The (old, wooden) desk.
- The (blue, large, square) box.
- An (important, legal, American) document.
- A (few, interesting, old) books.
- The (metal, small, shiny) key.
Answers:
- The old wooden desk.
- The large square blue box.
- An important American legal document.
- A few interesting old books.
- The small shiny metal key.
Advanced Topics
Beyond the basics, there are several advanced topics related to adjectives that can further enhance your legal writing skills.
Adjective Clauses
An adjective clause, also known as a relative clause, is a group of words that contains a subject and a verb and modifies a noun or pronoun. It functions as an adjective, providing additional information about the noun it modifies. Adjective clauses typically begin with relative pronouns (who, whom, which, that) or relative adverbs (where, when, why).
Examples:
- “The witness who testified provided crucial evidence.” (The adjective clause “who testified” modifies the noun “witness.”)
- “The document that was submitted contained false information.” (The adjective clause “that was submitted” modifies the noun “document.”)
- “The location where the crime occurred was thoroughly investigated.” (The adjective clause “where the crime occurred” modifies the noun “location.”)
In legal writing, adjective clauses can be used to provide specific details and clarify the meaning of a sentence. They can also help to avoid repetition and create more concise and effective writing.
Participles as Adjectives
Participles are verb forms that can function as adjectives, modifying nouns or pronouns. There are two types of participles: present participles (ending in -ing) and past participles (typically ending in -ed, -en, -t, or -n).
Examples:
- “The appealing case drew significant attention.” (The present participle “appealing” modifies the noun “case.”)
- “The written agreement was carefully reviewed.” (The past participle “written” modifies the noun “agreement.”)
- “The accused party maintained their innocence.” (The past participle “accused” modifies the noun “party.”)
Using participles as adjectives can add dynamism and descriptive power to your legal writing. They can also help to convey action or state of being in a concise and effective manner.
Nominalized Adjectives
Nominalized adjectives are adjectives that are used as nouns, typically referring to a general group of people or things. They are usually preceded by the definite article the.
Examples:
- “The poor deserve assistance.” (The nominalized adjective “poor” refers to people who are poor.)
- “The guilty must be punished.” (The nominalized adjective “guilty” refers to people who are guilty.)
- “The injured were provided with medical care.” (The nominalized adjective “injured” refers to people who are injured.)
Nominalized adjectives can be useful for making general statements or referring to broad categories of people or things in legal writing. However, it’s important to use them carefully and avoid generalizations that could be discriminatory or unfair.
Frequently Asked Questions
Here are some frequently asked questions about adjectives in legal writing:
How can I avoid overusing adjectives in my legal writing?
Focus on using strong, specific nouns and verbs that convey the meaning you intend. Only use adjectives when they add significant detail or clarity.
Review your writing and eliminate any adjectives that are redundant or unnecessary.
What is the best way to choose the right adjective for a particular context?
Consider the specific meaning you want to convey and the impact you want to have on the reader. Use a thesaurus to explore different options and

